Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to applied.works

Applied Works, Design partner to the world’s data pioneers · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
artemtoderian.com
Artem Toderian — Product Design Partner
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
nicstauber.com
Nic Stauber | Fractional Design Partner
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
benjaminrunning.com
Ben Running, product design partner for startups
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
abstracthow.com
Applied How - Product & design
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
bluemapdesign.com
bmd Home - Bluemap Design
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
bhartiyadesignparty.com
Home | Bhartiya Design Party
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
annadoral.net
Anna Dora L. applied art & design studio
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
blorencedesign.com
Blorence Design | The Creative Desinging Powerhouse
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
piccolodesignworkshop.com
Piccolo Design Workshop
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
therefore.com
therefore Design
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
felixslo.com
Felix Lo | Product Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
kurtcepe.com
Kurtcepe® | Award-Winning Design Studio for Digital & Physical Products
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
dixonmaradiaga.com
Studio — Graphic Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
arrisworkshop.com
Arris Workshop, Inc. | Architecture and Design Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
art1st.com
art1st | design that works
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
pixeluis.com
Pixeluis — Design & Engineering Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
thenamstudio.com
NAM Studio - Design work, the expert way
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
abbey-skinner.com
Abbey Skinner - Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.