Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to appeks.no

Appex > Design og teknologi · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
34match
halogen.com
Halogen
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
31match
arquitecturanueva.com
ARQUITECTURA NUEVA
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
20match
malinvindheim.com
malin vindheim
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
20match
eksentrisk.com
HJEM | EKSENTRISK
0 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
18match
2v-art.com
HJEM | 2v Art
2 co-citations0 shared tech0 shared categoryfine-art
18match
apenscene.com
Åpen Scene | Kulturtilbud i Oslo
2 co-citations0 shared tech0 shared categorytheater
16match
haugesundteater.com
Haugesundteater
2 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categorytheater
14match
ceciliehole.com
Cecilie Hole | art
2 co-citations0 shared tech0 shared categoryfine-art
13match
bakketunet.com
Heim - BAKKETUNET PÅ BJØRKE
2 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categoryfine-art
12match
grenlandfriteater.com
Hjem - Grenland Friteater
2 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categorytheater
10match
grevefestivalen.com
Grevefestivalen
2 co-citations0 shared tech0 shared categorytheater
4match
fjerme.com
FJERME STUDIO - new works
0 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categoryfine-art
4match
jenniferhalvorson.com
Jennifer Halvorson
0 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categoryfine-art
3match
borjamaria.com
Børjas bokstaver
1 co-citations1 shared tech0 shared categorytheater
2match
jemiladaush.com
Jemila Daush — Kunst & Bestillinger
0 co-citations1 shared tech0 shared categoryfine-art
2match
bakkane.com
Atelier Bakkane
0 co-citations1 shared tech0 shared categoryfine-art

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.