similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to apollo-aic.com

Apollo Aic alternatives & similar sites

APOLLO.aic - Foundation Terminal — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cscif.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	CSCIF - Cyber Security Consultation & Information Foundation	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cryptologicfoundation.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	National Cryptologic Foundation	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catchhot.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	CatchHot.com \| High-Frequency Domain Acquisition Terminal	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ctxzero.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	ctxzero — Penetration Tester	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
httpseverywhere.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	HTTPS Everywhere \| Electronic Frontier Foundation	en	information-and-network-security Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skulkr.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Skulkr — Elite Penetration Testing	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
needsec.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	NeedSec \| UK Penetration Testing & Cyber Security Services	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
nehilo.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Website Security Audits & Penetration Testing \| NEHILO	en	information-and-network-security WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
2hack.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	2hack - Penetration Testing as a Service	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
negrinisecurity.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Negrini Security \| Red Team and Penetration Testing.	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csctconference.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	International Conference on Cyberspace Security and Communication Technology (CSCT 2025)	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
loadcircle.app ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Verification & Identity Services	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
electronicfrontier.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Electronic Frontier Foundation \| Defending your rights in the digital world	en	information-and-network-security Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vortexshieldlabs.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Penetration Testing for Web, API, Cloud, and AI	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
2associes.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Electronic Frontier Foundation \| Defending your rights in the digital world	en	information-and-network-security Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
proteqon.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	ProteQon — Offensive Security & Penetration Testing	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
prudentsec.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	PrudentSec - Penetration Testing Services	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atls.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	ATLS Location Services	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.