Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aoctopus.net

A Octopus – What ho humans! · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
homomonologous.com
homo monologous – monologues for the human animal
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
abigail-mills.com
Abigail Mills – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
aubrikadkins.com
Aubri K. Adkins – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
aubriadkins.com
Aubri K. Adkins – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
mrkhaynes.com
MATTHEW R. K. HAYNES – WRITER
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
andthenwhathappened.net
And Then What Happened Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
palmorewrites.com
Palmore Writes – Where Dreams Become Fiction
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
efsunland.com
That's What She Read
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
jtorresauthor.com
J. Torres – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
justinywlau.com
Justin Lau – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
lourasmus.com
LOU RASMUS – books, stories, etc.
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
sinderpr.com
Sinder Penrose – When Life Happens
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
adrickbrock.com
Adrick Brock – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
craig-carey.com
Craig Carey – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
ebwagner.com
E. B. Wagner – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
juliefison.com
Julie Fison – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
lostbeinghuman.com
Lost Being Human Novel
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
andy-southall.com
Andy Southall – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.