Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to anym.dev

Anym - A Full Stack Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
abhiitp.tech
Abhishek | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
artisann.dev
Artisann | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
adamkent.net
Adam Kent - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
mattblum.com
Matt Blum | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
maymccabe.com
May McCabe - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
nevilleingram.com
Neville Ingram - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
thejuliakim.com
Julia Kim — Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
sohbi.dev
Nohé Sohbi · Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
alanmatthews.net
Alan Matthews | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
alanbardales.dev
Alan Bardales | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
ashishgurjar.dev
Ashish Gurjar - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
nikitapestin.com
Nikita Pestin | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
dom-fung.com
DomFung is a Full Stack Developer | DomFung
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
clowerweb.com
Chris Clower — Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
nickvarterian.com
Nick Varterian | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
thejulianjara.com
Julián Jara — Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
abhishekbhat.com
Abhishek Bhat — Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
rolsson.com
Robert Olsson — Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.