Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to antonfagerberg.com

- Anton Fagerberg · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
maexal.dev
Max Altena
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
dimiterpetrov.com
Dimiter Petrov
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
basokant.com
Ben Asokanthan
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
basti.dev
Sebastian Plagemann - Software Engineering Director
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
maggieweng.dev
mweng.dev
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
molleejain.com
Mollee Jain
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
maanavsingh.com
About me - Maanav Singh
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
iwahbe.com
iWahbe
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
andriikurochka.com
Andrii Kurochka
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andrelousamarques.com
André Lousa Marques
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
lvacula.com
Temporary Permanence | Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
reshetnikov.com
Anton Reshetnikov
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
cacarer.com
Home - Cansin Acarer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
magemi.dev
Emilio's Crag
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
surenk.com
Suren's Site
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
garykrause.dev
Gary in Binary | A personal blog website with random musings.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
codertau.be 🇧🇪
Codertau.be — Ideas worth spreading
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andyjia.com
Hello from Home | Home
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.