Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to antisf.com

Home - AntipodeanSF · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
anapanda.com
WELCOME - Home - Anapanda Books
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
67match
isleofbooks.com
Home - Isle of Books
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
67match
battlefield-earth.com
Home - battlefieldearth
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
67match
battlefieldearth.com
Home - battlefieldearth
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
66match
pjflie.com
Home - Home of Author P.J. Flie
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
66match
jacobbontrager.com
Home - Jacob Bontrager
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
66match
3dnovatica.com
Home - 3dnovatica.com
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
66match
antediluvianmag.com
Home | Antediluvian
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
65match
shitweveread.com
Home - Shit We've Read
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
65match
pomred.com
Home - 365tomorrows - A Flash of Science Fiction, Daily Since 2005
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
64match
shawgin.com
Wartide - Home
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
64match
baublesfrombones.com
Baubles From Bones - Home Page
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
64match
eternitybookseries.com
Home
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
64match
shawnraben.com
Home | Shawn Raben Books
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
64match
garyhurtubise.com
Gary Hurtubise - Welcome to my World(s)
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
64match
oabhatti.com
O. A. Bhatti – Writer of sci-fi/fantasy/speculative fiction and horror.
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
63match
lynetteaspey.com
L A Aspey - Home
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
63match
annalsofthekeepers.com
Home | Annal of the Keepers
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.