Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to anthonykim.dev

anthony@portfolio:~$ · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
pablolp.com
Pablo's portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
luisbaez.dev
Luis Baez - Android Developer Portfolio
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
juanjosegarciacan.com
Juan Jose Garcia Cantero - Software Engineer Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
lorenzogil.com
Lorenzo Gil Sánchez
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
lukaszr.com
Lukasz Rozycki
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
corycaywood.com
Cory Caywood | Software Engineer | Home
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
overroot.com
Muhammad Hasan Khan — Software Engineer
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
jwyce.com
Jared Wyce
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
regadas.dev
Filipe Regadas
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
andrewrotert.com
Andrew Rotert
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
ahmedsobhy.net
Ahmed Sobhy - Computer Engineering Student
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
mrlacey.com
Matt Lacey - Software Developer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
alanw.org
Alan Wang - Software Engineer & Researcher
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
lucasfnicolau.com
Lucas Fernandez Nicolau
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
sillycycle.com
David Bagley's Home Page
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
buchmiller.dev
Sam Buchmiller
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
abio.la
Abiola Ibrahim
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
abiosoft.com
Abiola Ibrahim
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.