Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to antediluvianmag.com

Home | Antediluvian · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
annalsofthekeepers.com
Home | Annal of the Keepers
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
67match
rhettbruno.com
Home | Rhett C. Bruno
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
66match
calicobook.com
Home | Calico Sci-fi Novel
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
66match
baublesfrombones.com
Baubles From Bones - Home Page
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
66match
shawnraben.com
Home | Shawn Raben Books
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
66match
andrekgeorge.com
Andre K. George Home | AI science fiction
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
65match
isleofbooks.com
Home - Isle of Books
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
65match
lynetteaspey.com
L A Aspey - Home
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
65match
pjflie.com
Home - Home of Author P.J. Flie
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
65match
rhondazatezalo.com
home - Rhonda Zatezalo
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
65match
anapanda.com
WELCOME - Home - Anapanda Books
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
65match
eternitybookseries.com
Home
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
64match
caitlindemers.com
Home | Caitlin Demers | Sci-fi/fantasy Author
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
64match
cambrianhousebooks.com
Cambrian House Books
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
64match
ethereamagazine.com
Etherea MAGAZINE – Australian Science Fiction and Fantasy
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
64match
3dnovatica.com
Home - 3dnovatica.com
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
64match
battlefield-earth.com
Home - battlefieldearth
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
64match
battlefieldearth.com
Home - battlefieldearth
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.