Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to anotherdoggedpress.com

Another Dogged Press · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
theparticlepapers.com
Rousted Press
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
2apress.org
login | 2A Press
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
ahram-press.com
AHRAM press
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
phxitpress.com
PHX-IT Press
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
2ndavenuepress.com
Publisher | 2nd Avenue Press
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
unitedpressgroup.com
United Printers LLC | Professional Printing Press in Oman
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
newgaiapress.com
New Gaïa Press
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
soulattitudepress.com
Soul Attitude Press
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
anothersmallpress.net
Another Small Press | Independent Publishers
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
a5press.net
A5 Press
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
insightleappress.com
Insightleap Press
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
boularderieislandpress.com
Boularderie Island Press
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
piersidepress.com
Pierside Press, LLC
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
aldarprinting.com
Aldar Printing Press
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
universci.com
UNIVERSCI - UniverSci Press
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
pinkapplemint.com
Pink Apple Mint Press
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
dllegere.com
Woodhall Press | David LeGere
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
theremarkableway.com
Niche Pressworks
1 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.