Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to annewinterbottom.com

Anne Winterbottom's Resume · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
swaralishirke.com
Swarali Shirke's Resume
2 shared topicscareers
66match
essaddek.com
Mohammed Essaddek - Technical Lead .NET | Interactive Resume
2 shared topicscareers
65match
mohdfaisal.com
Mohd Faisal - Digital Dev Resume
2 shared topicscareers
65match
koodalanne.com
koodalanne | Freelance Software Developer
2 shared topicscareers
64match
andre123us.com
Interactive Resume - Advance Technology Expert
2 shared topicscareers
64match
andersoftware.com
Andersson Quintero — Senior Software Engineer & Tech Lead
2 shared topicscareers
64match
andrescampanario.com
Andres Campanario - Resume/CV
2 shared topicscareers
64match
izharnjoroge.com
Izhar Njoroge | Software Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
64match
ganeshavhad.com
Resume - Ganesh Avhad
2 shared topicscareers
63match
antoine-monesma.com
Senior full stack developer | web, mobile, AI, web3 & blockchain
2 shared topicscareers
63match
swdit.com
Salman Ahmed – Interactive CV
2 shared topicscareers
63match
lawrencereed.co.uk 🇬🇧
Lawrence Reed - Lead Engineer, Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicscareers
63match
ivanobeso.dev
Ivan Obeso - Senior Backend Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
63match
shaneabh.com
Shane Abraham | Full Stack Software Developer | Open to Work
2 shared topicscareers
63match
mohamedyahia.com
Resume || full-stack developer
2 shared topicscareers
63match
maarcus.dev
maarcus reniero l
2 shared topicscareers
63match
aniefon.dev
Aniefon Umanah | Senior Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicscareers
63match
eugenrupi.com
Eugen Rupi - Full Stack Software Engineer
2 shared topicscareers

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.