Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to annaspindler.com

Anna Spindler – design portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
petesteger.com
petesteger. – design portfolio in progress.
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
robhoff.com
Robert Hoffmann – product design portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
tagtraumagentur.de 🇩🇪
Sofia Anna Gerstlacher – Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
kreaandrea.com
design. portfolio.
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
realog.de 🇩🇪
Realog – Designagentur
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
seblocke.de 🇩🇪
Sebastian Locke – Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
seecode.de 🇩🇪
SEECODE – DESIGN | LIFESTYLE
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
supergold.de 🇩🇪
Supergold – Designbüro
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
peterdieter.com
Peter Dieter – Graphic Design
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
pizzahaus-bernburg.de 🇩🇪
CHIC IDEA – Design & Kommunikation
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
qrbranding.de 🇩🇪
CHIC IDEA – Design & Kommunikation
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
reallyreallynice.de 🇩🇪
REALLY REALLY NICE – Design Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
smartngo.de 🇩🇪
smartNGO – DESIGN FOR YOUR MISSION
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
strothmann-produktdesign.de 🇩🇪
Matti Strothmann Produktdesign Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
studio-human.de 🇩🇪
STUDIO HUMAN – Design für Menschen
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
nicolareber.com
Nicola Reber – Grafikdesign
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
symdesign-studio.de 🇩🇪
Dominique Symanowski | Industrial Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
raeuberdeern.de 🇩🇪
RäuberDeern – Design by Ronja Reichert
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.