Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to annapearson.dev

Anna Pearson · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
ktchoi.com
Katie Choi Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
faridazhari.com
Farid Azhari | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
mattiapaiano.com
Mattia Paiano - Creative Developer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
sjp-digital.co.uk 🇬🇧
Simon Parsonage // Freelance Front End Web Developer // Cheshire
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
federicoreina.com
Federico Reina - Página personal
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
robcaluza.com
Rob Caluza - Frontend Developer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
gregoireduhem.com
Grégoire Duhem Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
abdulbarcky.com
Abdul Barcky Arimiyao | Frontend Developer & Web Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
1ockwood.com
Craig Lockwood | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
1ockwood.dev
Craig Lockwood | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
mateofilip.com
Mateo Filip
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
mattlavo.com
Matt Lavo - Frontend Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
alexoviedo.info
Alejandro Oviedo - Front-End Developer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
andrian-kars.com
Dark Site | Andrian Karsanashvili
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
benrussellvick.com
Ben Russell-Vick - Creative Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
roaashattnawi.com
Roaa Shattnawi - Roaa Shattnawi
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
tsukani.dev
Portfolio // Christian Jakobsen
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
bgonzalezswe.com
Brandon Gonzalez | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.