Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to annamadit.com

annamadit | designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
evasims.com
Eva Sims | Product Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
71match
anitahatchett.com
AH Design
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
71match
ogabe.com
Gabe | Design
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
71match
gasperursic.com
Gasper Ursic | Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
71match
helikodesign.com
HelikoDesign
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
71match
korobchuk.com
Ivan Korobchuk | Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
kotanna.com
Anna Kot | UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
evarobboy.com
UX + UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
ritawangarchive.com
Rita Wang | Product Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
kriesse.com
Kristina Schneider | Product, Design & CSS. Berlin
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
kristinaschneider.com
Kristina Schneider | Product, Design & CSS. Berlin
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
etgilbert.com
Eliza Gilbert | Designer & Strategist
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
heyalexo.com
Alexo UX Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
nvw-design.com
NVW Design
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
69match
madebylark.com
Designer Lark
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
69match
annadavydov.com
Anna Davydov | Designer | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
69match
annasalvadori.com
Home - Anna UX UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
69match
moisez.com
Moisez - UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.