similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to annadowdall.com

Anna Dowdall – Anna Dowdall · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

Anna Bushi – Anna Bushi Author Site

2 shared topicsfiction

magdagejnevall.com

Magda Gejnevall – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anna-gracia.com

author anna gracia – news about author Anna Gracia

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Anna Funder | Anna Funder

2 shared topicsfiction

Anna Zabo – Books and news from author Anna Zabo

2 shared topicsfiction

djdavisauthor.com

DJ Davis – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Ly Faulk – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anneboothauthor.com

Anne Booth – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Cal Devney – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

G.E. Forth – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

lydiahopebooks.com

Lydia Hope – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

molleafoust.com

Mollea Foust – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

annanthonyauthor.com

Ann Anthony – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Gary Piercy – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Helen Goltz – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

rhettallenauthor.com

Rhett Allen – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

G.B. Gillean – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

maciecraven.com

Macie Craven – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.