Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ann-wk.com

Ann Kim — UX/UI Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
anishyadav.com
Anish Yadav — UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
76match
gavinkeenan.com
Gavin Keenan — UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
75match
calebepaglioza.com
Calebe Paglioza — UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
anasselarroussi.com
Anass Elarroussi — UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
dinashree.com
Dinashree Dinesh — UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
hellojoelng.com
Joel Ng UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
madalinachelaru.com
Mădălina Chelaru — UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
moisez.com
Moisez - UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
73match
kotanna.com
Anna Kot | UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
73match
lydiajin-portfolio.com
Lydia Jin - UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
anjabudimirovic.com
UX/UI Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
anitashahdesign.com
Anita Shah — Senior UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
annazamoradesigns.com
Anna Zamora | UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
itsarsalan.com
Arsalan Ahmed - UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
andreagrewell.com
Andrea Grewell | UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
djwooster.com
DJ Wooster — UX / UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
konisonportfolio.com
Koni Son – UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
monicalockett.com
Monica Lockett | UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.