Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to anlerkan.dev

Anılerkan Madenci · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
cagataycaliskan.com
Çağatay Çalışkan - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
mohdkhan.com
Mohammed Khan — Frontend Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
swapnilsuryajoshi.com
Swapnil Suryajoshi — Frontend Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
hellorhine.dev
Home
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
herecomesthecode.com
Daniel Polak — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
beaubuckman.com
Beau Buckman | Full Stack Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
moitinho.dev
João Vitor Moitinho — Fullstack Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
camilasilva.com
Camila Silva | Frontend Engineer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
survila.dev
Martynas Survila | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
antonkolesnik.com
Anton Kolesnik
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
heyemon.dev
Senior Frontend Engineer (React.js & Next.js) | 3 YOE
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
shanjoel.com
Shan Joel — Front-End Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
dilovan.dev
Dilovan Hassan — Full-Stack Developer in Uppsala, Sweden
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
eugenecozac.com
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
heinsoe.com
Hein Soe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
koladeleolaitan.com
Koladele Olaitan — Senior Frontend Engineer & Technical Lead
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
nurdanvayni.com
Nurdan — Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
ankanpal.com
Ankan Pal | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.