Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ankorholding.com

Ankor Holding · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
mbholdco.com
MB Holdings
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
73match
arimholding.com
ARIM Holding
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
72match
asemholdings.com
Asem Holdings
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
kzu-group.com
KZU Holding Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
70match
gtbholding.com
GTB HOLDINGS - Home
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
69match
labadiholdings.com
Home | Labadi Holdings
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
aldawood.net
Al Dawood Holding Group
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
birlikteholding.com
Home - Birlikte Holding
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
aetnaholdings.com.my
EPCC HOLDINGS SDN. BHD.
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
thenationtrust.com
The Nation Trust Holding
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
kyrgyzinvestholding.com
KYRGYZ INVEST HOLDING LLC
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
pjinh.com
PJ Investments & Holdings
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
68match
domusviaeholdings.com
Home - DOMUS VIAE HOLDINGS
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
66match
achiscaffolding.com
ACHI Scaffolding
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
66match
inspaceglobal.com
Inspace Global Holding Pte. Ltd.
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
66match
as-group.co.uk 🇬🇧
A & A Scaffolding
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
66match
bfs-holding.com
BFS Holding | Business Future Supplies
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry
66match
mauiscaffolding.com
Maui Scaffolding LLC
1 shared topicsconstruction-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.