Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ankitnakhawa.dev

Ankit Nakhawa · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
mbruijns.com
Marco Bruijns
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
ankitkumar.org
Ankit Kumar
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
angad.tech
Angad Misra - Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
aalazz.me
Alexis Lazzarotto — Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
abuzer.tech
Abuzer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
mat3o.com
Matthew Nowicki
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
matroussilhe.com
Mathieu Roussilhe
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
max-heller.com
Max Heller | Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
roddehugo.com
Hugo Rodde
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
thepaulstella.com
Paul A. Stella II
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
bigzoo.me
Chris Nyaga
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
rkknox.com
Richard Knox
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
bigtrendmobil.com
BIG Trendmobil | Software Engineering
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
piotrtobolski.com
Piotr Tobolski - Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
roberteshleman.com
Robert Eshleman
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
abrarahmed236.com
Abrar Ahmed
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
kylesf.com
Kyle Stewart-Frantz | Software Engineer & Entrepreneur
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
rohangottipati.com
Rohan Gottipati - Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.