Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ankitg.dev

Ankit | Portfolio 👨🏻‍💻 · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
fernandozago.com
Fernando Zago - Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
robertnant.com
Robert's Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
nghongray.com
Ng Hong Ray | Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
faridahmadov.com
My Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
dmuir.dev
Portfolio by David Muir
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
felixfanady.com
Felix Fanady | Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
angel-castaneda.net
Angel Castaneda – Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
mayukhsinha.com
Mayukh Sinha - Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
kushvora.com
Kush Vora | Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
pichirichi.com
Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
favioleca.com
Favio Leca
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
fedeizzo.dev
Federico Izzo
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
matthewlapeer.com
Matthew Lapeer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
bipulhf.dev
Bipul — Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
bhavikkpatel.com
Digital Workspace Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
angelside.net
AngelSide
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
feiwhang.com
Fei Whang | Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
mattport.com
Matt Port | CV
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.