Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ankitdhall.dev

Ankit Dhall · Data Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
kyleprouty.com
prouty.io | Data Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
alibashir.info
Ali Bashir — Senior Data Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
rjasti.com
Rajeev Jasti | Principal Data Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
nevenkalukic.com
Nevenka Lukic - Data Engineer & Technical Writer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
alastairgarner.dev
Alastair - Data & Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
grindengineer.com
Grind Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
boosteng.com
Boost Engineering
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
doist.dev
Doist Engineering
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
mataroll.com
Matar Roll - QA Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
bensack.io
Ben Sack | Data/Platform Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
thepixelengineer.com
The Pixel Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
achchu.net
Achchu - Senior QA Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
arnabhazari.com
Arnab — Data, Engineering & Ideas
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
maxdeviant.com
Home · maxdeviant.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
rmhoover.dev
Ryan Hoover ·
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
romsics.com
Laszlo Romsics — Engineer & Data Scientist
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
ackerworx.dev
AckerWorx Engineering
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
adrianclarke.dev
Adrian Clarke — QA Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.