Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to ankersmid.com

Home · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
91match
ankersmid-lab.com
Home
3 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorymechanical-and-industrial-engineering-industry
91match
ankersmid-process.com
Home
3 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorymechanical-and-industrial-engineering-industry
70match
van-ketel.nl 🇳🇱
Home
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymechanical-and-industrial-engineering-industry
50match
24h-hitech.nl 🇳🇱
Home | 24H-Hitech
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymanufacturing-industry
47match
laserflux.com
Industriële reiniging met lasertechnologie - Laserflux
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymechanical-and-industrial-engineering-industry
47match
vanzele-elektro.be 🇧🇪
Industriële elektriciteit, automatisatie en bordenbouw | Belmatic
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymechanical-and-industrial-engineering-industry
44match
buroboot.com
Home
2 co-citations1 shared techexecutive-leadership-and-management
44match
a3-koeltechniek.nl 🇳🇱
Specialist in koelsystemen - A3
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymechanical-and-industrial-engineering-industry
43match
thewordpro.nl 🇳🇱
HOME
2 co-citations1 shared techmarketing-and-advertising
42match
vanrossummelkwinning.nl 🇳🇱
vanrossummelkwinning - vanrossummelkwinning
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymechanical-and-industrial-engineering-industry
42match
vanderzalmbv.nl 🇳🇱
Elke staalconstructie van engineering tot montage.
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymechanical-and-industrial-engineering-industry
41match
vanegtenbv.nl 🇳🇱
Home
2 co-citations1 shared techmanufacturing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.