Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to anishchanda.dev

Anish Chanda · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
aadilahsan.tech
Aadil Ahsan | Software Engineer
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
mdanishs.com
Mohammad Danish Siddiqui
3 shared topicsweb-development
68match
piorus.com
Piotr Rusin @piorus
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kwhitejr.com
Kevin White
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
mattiabeccari.com
Mattia Beccari
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
matthiaslexer.com
Matthis Lexer - Software Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
ronaldo.dev
Ronaldo Ramos Junior – Software Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
piatorain.com
Pia Torain
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
bfil.io
Bruno Filippone, Software Engineering | BFil.IO
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
nextbitestudio.com
NextBite Studio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
aaronbotton.dev
Aaron Botton | Software Engineer
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
mbotton.com
Aaron Botton | Software Engineer
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
arjunsajeev.com
Arjun Sajeev
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
soheilhomayoonfard.com
Soheil Homayoonfard
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
alexmarsh.dev
Alex Marsh Digital
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
themarmararesidence.com
Aymane Boukrouh - Senior Software Engineer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
abdrehimmisbah.dev
Abdrehim | Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
phongbach.com
Phong Bach - Software Development Engineer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.