Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to angievella.com

Angie Vella ▲▼ Designer, Maker, Systems Thinker · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
itsjonq.com
Q. Designer. Maker. Systems thinker.
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
esingleton.com
Eric Singleton | Designer, Researcher, Maker
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
andreaford.com
Andrea Ford Set Stylist, Designer, Maker
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
madebygh.com
Grady Harwood — Designer, Developer, Maker
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
angkurn.com
Angkurn - Product Systems Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
ricardoharo.com
Ricky Haro | Product Designer — UX, Systems & Visual Design
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
suthinali.com
Suthina Li | Digital Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
madebyjevon.com
Jevon Wallace — Brand & Visual Systems Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
dithern.com
Ernesto Gonzalo – Senior Product Designer | AI, Systems, Scale
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
esthervella.com
Esther Vella | Visual Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
gannonmeister.com
Gannon Meister | Brand & Digital Systems Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
angeluxui.com
Ángel Martínez · Senior Product Designer | B2B SaaS, Design Systems & AI
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
anildesigns.com
Anil Jadhav - Design Leader, Design Systems & Product Design
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
madebychip.com
Chip Dong Lim — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
richlim.com
Rich Lim · Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
greenwoodsystems.co.uk 🇬🇧
Greenwood Systems Design
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
supervisualteam.com
Designing Brand Systems
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
andyjhlai.com
Andy Lai | Designer
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.