similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to angeline.de

Angeline alternatives & similar sites

culture & communication – culture and communication — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Language Learning →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
a-ct.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	HomePage-DE - ¡ACT! Avance Communication & Translation	de	language-learning WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
academics-and-culture.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - ACADEMICS and CULTURE	de	language-learning WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
academics-and-culture.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - ACADEMICS and CULTURE	de	language-learning WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
academics-and-culture.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - ACADEMICS and CULTURE	de	language-learning WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
institute-lccs.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Institute for Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Studies (Berlin)	de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystal-fleck.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	KulturKompass – Deine Plattform für globale Kulturvielfalt	de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cfilli.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	ace-it applications GmbH	Switzerland de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
af-international.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	AF-International – Interkulturelle Beratung \| Sprachkurse \| Übersetzungen	Germany de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
jobconnectschool.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	JobConnect Online Languages and Coaching	de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dach-ge.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Association DACH Sprache und Kultur Genf – Für Kinder im Raum Genf & Ihren Bezug zur Deutschen Sprache	de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deutsch-persisch.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Integrationsmanagement – Die bunten Verwandten	de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deutsch-lernen-ebooks.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	B1 Prüfung & Deutsch lernen – Präsentationen, Briefe, A1 A2 B1 eBooks	de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aylearn.ch ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	ay learn – Die Lerntherapie	Switzerland de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bbz-sprachenschule.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	BBZ Sprachschulen – Zertifizierter Integrations- und Berufssprachkursträger seit 2005.	de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
centralreisen.ch ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Central Reisen – Central reisen in sieben verschiedenen Ländern	Switzerland de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
alphabeta-education.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	ALPHA BETA Language & Coaching -Home	Germany de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
angloclub.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Angloclub of Cologne Conversation group	Germany de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
b-weiner.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Barbara Weiner Redaktion Lektorat Übersetzung	Germany de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.