Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to anerd.com

Peter Vogel - creative technologist · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
gumtech.co.uk 🇬🇧
Gum Technologies
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
shivaspheretechnologies.com
ShivaSphere Technologies
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
morlantech.com
Mor-Lan Technologies
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
susmoynath.com
Technologist | Susmoy Nath
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
etntechnology.com
ETN Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
consellotech.com
Consello Technologies
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
discovertechnologies.com
Discover Technologies
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
gen-ztechnology.com
Gen-Z Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
resettechnologies.net
Resettechnologie
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
beauheffron.com
Beau Heffron | Data & Commerce Technologist
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
evannee.com
Evan Nee - Technologist in Norfolk, VA
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
anvisiotech.com
Anvisio Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
rev0tech.com
index | REV0 TECHNOLOGIES
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
swiscomtechnology.com
Swiscom Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
redskytechnology.co.uk 🇬🇧
Red Sky Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
gcutech.org
GCU Technology Club
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
itwingtech.com
Home - IT Wing Technologies
2 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
dishaayein.com
Dishaayein Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.