Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aneil-tripathy.com

Aneil Tripathy, PhD · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
mariza-montesdeoca.com
Mariza Montes de Oca Leon
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
marcfulmer.com
Marc Fulmer, PhD | Economist and Data Scientist
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
ignaciooliva.com
Ignacio Oliva
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
paulstainier.com
Paul Stainier – Postdoctoral Fellow, University of Pennsylvania
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
mariacarnovale.com
Maria Carnovale, PhD
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
marianabessa.com
Mariana Bessa Ribeiro - Economics PhD Candidate
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
globaltradeobserver.com
Global Trade Observer
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
kilianrieder.com
Kilian Rieder – Principal economist (OeNB, CEPR & SUERF)
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
andreas-ferrara.com
Andy Ferrara
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
marcocastelluccio.com
Marco Castelluccio
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
namratakala.com
Namrata Kala
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
acwatt.net
Aaron C Watt – Energy, Resource, & Environmental Economics PhD
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
tevintafese.com
Home - Tevin Tafese Website
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
charomorley.com
Charo Morley | Trade, Policy & Economic Development
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
dennis-kolcava.com
Dr. Dennis Kolcava | Dr. Dennis Kolcava
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
marleyrandazzo.com
Marley Randazzo | Urban Planning and Development Researcher
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
matteo-ferroni.com
Matteo F. Ferroni
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
paulschaudt.com
Paul Schaudt | Associate Professor of Economics at KU Leuven
1 shared topicseconomy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.