similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to anect.com

ANECT a.s. | Bezpečný provoz vašeho IT · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

ComSeCom - IT služby jak je neznáte

2 shared topicsit-and-internet-support

HLAVA, s.r.o. — IT správa a bezpečnost pro firmy v Praze

2 shared topicsit-and-internet-support

Kybernetická Bezpečnost | Esko-sw

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Caleum – Bezpečnost, Aplikace, Infrastruktura, Cloud a Servis

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

ACRESIA - Domů

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Iservery – Profesionální IT řešení, monitoring, virtualizace a automatizace

1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Ing. Mojmír Král

1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support

start [supler.com]

1 shared topicsit-and-internet-support

4CyberCity - Školení zaměstnanců v kybernetické bezpečnosti

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

ABRATICA – Cybersecurity a realizace síťových řešení

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Shield ITSM | Information Technology Security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

SUPRAWORK – Přihlášení

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Nxtrum — AI implementace na míru | Kybernetická bezpečnost | Cloud řešení

1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.