Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to andystitt.com

Andy Stitt - Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
congq.com
Q Cong - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
andythelam.com
Andy | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
aniali.dev
Anish Ali - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
andybangs.com
Andy Bangs | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
gauravlad.com
Gaurav Lad - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
itugui.com
Ioan Tugui - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ivanluna.dev
Iván Luna - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
calebdeerr.com
Caleb Deerr - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
anilozmen.com
Anıl Özmen - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
dillankerai.com
Dillan Kerai - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
lxkota.com
Jack Coleman - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
swaggerstudios.com
Travis Libby - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
gamerrishad.com
Rishad | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
morenojoshua.com
Joshua Moreno - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
suzynakayama.com
Suzy Nakayama - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
andrepangestu.com
Andre Pangestu - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
hermanmakarov.com
Herman Makarov - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
hersitech.com
Hersi — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.