Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andyray.com

Andy Ray | Substack · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
rocamonde.com
Cuaderno | Juan | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
75match
pierreblog.com
Pierre Blog | Substack
2 shared topicspoetry
74match
arseniusvox.com
Arsenius Vox | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
andrewterry.org
Greatest of These | Andrew Terry | Substack
2 shared topicspoetry
70match
dnatkins.com
Dilly's Lily Pad | Dylan Atkins | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
cmescabi.com
CHAI'FFEINATED | C. M. Escabi | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
anotherdrunkaspiringwriter.com
~ another drunk aspiring writer ~ | Frederick Clark X | Substack
2 shared topicspoetry
65match
dmdubay.com
dmdubay | author
2 shared topicspoetry
64match
ariyabandy.com
ARIYA BANDY - Ariya Bandy
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
andrewdjames.com
Andy James | Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
63match
thepoetscane.com
the poet's cane – Colin Harris-Day's blog
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
benjaminbratz.com
Benjamin Bratz – Reflect and Learn and Grow and Repeat
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
benstarrwrites.com
Ben Starr - Poet & Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
63match
socialyetdistanced.com
Social yet Distanced Pod Collective
2 shared topicspoetry
63match
maureenbjones.com
Maureen Buchanan Jones – Poetry & Fiction Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
rlraymond.com
R L Raymond
2 shared topicspoetry
62match
nevillekeery.com
Neville Keery | Writing and Publishing · www.nevillekeery.com
2 shared topicspoetry
62match
robstepney.com
Rob Stepney | Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.