Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andyoldham.net

Andy Oldham - Personal Website · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
phoresl.com
Personal website of Orest Smertnyi
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
dataviz.co.uk 🇬🇧
Educational Website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
andrewburger.net
Andrew Burger · The personal website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
fatosmorina.com
Fatos Morina - Personal blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
ktovoz.com
Kto's Blog - Personal Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
benetis.me
Personal Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
blueeyeten.com
Home | My Personal Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
benedicthenshaw.com
ben's website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
pippodima.com
Curriculum - My Website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
alexgrimm.dev
Personal Coding Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
arifluthfi.com
Arif's Website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
masontate.com
My CPSC 3750 Website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
100daysofcode.com
#100DaysOfCode Official Website | #100DaysOfCode
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
alaskanemily.net
Alaskan Emily's Website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
aleggett.me
Aaron Leggett's website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
abigailsarath.net
Abigail's Awesome Website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
phrees.com
Phil Rees Personal Blog | Personal blog for Phil Rees - writer of prose, poetry and code.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
andywhittle.dev
Andy Whittle
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.