Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andykelk.net

Home | Andy Kelk · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
andrewswagner.com
Home | Andy Wagner
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
76match
andyswagner.com
Home | Andy Wagner
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
73match
advancedpracticemanagement.com
Home | APM
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
72match
arooconsulting.com
Home | AROO
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
72match
fbeinternational.com
Home | FBE
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
72match
andrewgeoffrey.net
Home | Andrew Geoffrey
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
72match
roastingheadquarters.com
Home | RHQ
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
71match
aaaccgroup.com
HOME | AAACC
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
71match
fattree.io
Home | Alliance X
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
71match
pi-ol.com
Home | PIOL
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
70match
adverdeinsights.com
Home | Adverde
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
70match
1-6s.com
Home | L-6S
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
70match
domanira.com
Home | Domanira
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
70match
robertgascoyne.com
Home | RGCL
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
70match
armanola.com
HOME | ArmaNola
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
70match
asiangate.org
Home | Asian Gate
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
70match
bloomfieldtechnology.com
Home |
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
70match
arosadvisory.com
Home | Aros Advisory
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.