Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to andykeep.com

Andrew W. Keep---Compiler Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
compengineer.com
compengineer | Home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
hendrikjoosten.com
Hendrik Joosten | Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
kovacou.com
Alexandre KOVAC - Golang & Database Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
andrewls.com
AndrewLS — Software Engineer | C++, Flutter & Python
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
bayubit.com
bayubit | software engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
eschgi.com
Stefan Eschgfäller — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
andrewscala.com
Andrew Scala
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
compilenrun.com
Compile N Run
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
ricardohsmello.com
Ricardo Mello — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
compiledvision.com
Compiled Vision
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
kriteris.com
kriteris engine
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
oabujala.com
Omar Abu-Jalalah | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
mondotondo.com
Weapon of Choice – Andrea Ercolino, Software Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
conghau.com
JASON NGUYEN – Software Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
kozhanov.dev
Dmytro Kozhanov - Senior Java Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
compilerbook.com
Writing A Compiler In Go | Thorsten Ball
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
compilade.com
Compilade
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewreedhall.com
Andrew Hall's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.