Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andykant.com

Andy Kant | Principal Frontend Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
mabsrahman.com
Mabs Rahman | Frontend Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
itsdavidramos.com
David Ramos - Principal Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
ismaeljtl.com
Ismael Teixeira | Professional Frontend Developer and Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
antaresjeet.com
Ranjit | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
anujdhanuka.com
Anuj Dhanuka | Software Engineer | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
3raul.com
Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
ankanpal.com
Ankan Pal | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
anuarder.dev
Anuar Ibrayev | Senior Software Engineer | Frontend
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
dnuge.dev
Daniel Nugent | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
2llsoft.com
2LLSOFT | Premium Software Engineering
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
dnhen.com
dnhen | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
ivan-domain.com
Ivan — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
morhys.com
Morhys - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
gedasga.com
GedasGa | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
madsokami.com
Madelyn | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
dmitryjum.com
Dmitry Jum software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
heinsoe.com
Hein Soe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
hfend.com
@hfend · Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.