Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andyjurd.com

Andy Jurd, Teacher, Scientist, Caver · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
aaa-scientists.com
AAA Scientists
1 shared topicsscience
68match
thenaturescientist.com
NATURE SCIENTIST
1 shared topicsscience
66match
rmadankan.com
Reza Madankan, Ph.D. | Data Scientist, Amazon
1 shared topicsscience
66match
labtech.co.uk 🇬🇧
Serving Scientists - Labtech
1 shared topicsscience
66match
diversediscoveries.com
Empowering Diverse Scientists
1 shared topicsscience
66match
mattgiguere.com
Matt Giguere - Data Scientist
1 shared topicsscience
66match
askascientistsf.com
Ask a Scientist lecture series
1 shared topicsscience
66match
asdas.org
ASSOCIATION SDA SCIENTISTS - Home
1 shared topicsscience
66match
ariel-morrison.com
Climate Scientist | Ariel Morrison
1 shared topicsscience
65match
dnaofaruralscientist.com
Home | DNAofaRuralScientist
1 shared topicsscience
65match
dodiem.com
The Scientific Wolf
1 shared topicsscience
65match
next-read.com
Dr Emma Boland - Physical Oceanographer, Climate Scientist
1 shared topicsscience
65match
arielzj.com
Ariel Zeleznikow-Johnston - neuroscientist, author
1 shared topicsscience
65match
masterlabscientific.com
Master Lab Scientific
1 shared topicsscience
65match
roosvanduijnhoven.com
Roos van Duijnhoven | Behavioral Scientist
1 shared topicsscience
65match
robtheoceanographer.com
Rob Johnson | Hi, I’m Rob. I’m a scientist, agilist, coach, and educator.
1 shared topicsscience
65match
arkscientificsolutions.com
Ark Scientific Solutions
1 shared topicsscience
65match
armelscientifics.com
Home - ArMel Scientifics
1 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.