Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andygarrett.net

Andy Garrett · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
rpandu.com
Fullstack Engineer - Ravin Pandu
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andyhorn.dev
Andy Horn — Flutter Engineer & Package Author
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
codedrip.dev
All posts | code drip ☕
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
adamstaples.dev
Adam Staples | Reflective Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
andyfoster.net
Andy Foster | GitForked
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
picostitch.com
Home | picostitch - crafting (and) JavaScript
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
roopak.dev
Roopak Srinivasan - Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
andybarringer.com
Andy Barringer | Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
mattshen.com
Software Engineering Notes
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
bhomnick.net
Ben Homnick
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
fatihkalifa.com
Fatih Kalifa | Interface Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
kriuchkov.com
Nikita Kriuchkov - Software Engineer & Technology Enthusiast // KRIUCKOV.COM
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
kunaldubey.com
Kunal Dubey | Full Stack Engineer & System Designer
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
rocha.dev
Carlos Rocha
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
alexanderfletcher.dev
Alex's Blog
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
codehaak.com
CodeHaak | Håkon Høyem Ruud
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
bnlucas.com
Nathan Lucas — Staff Software Engineer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
neuralphantom.com
Ali Tarakzai
3 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.