Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andyflack.com

Home - Andy Flack Psychology · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
angelasovak.com
Home | Psychology
1 shared topicsmental-health
72match
clinicalpsychology.uk 🇬🇧
Home - Clinical Psychology
1 shared topicsmental-health
71match
anima-media.com
Home | Media Psychology
1 shared topicsmental-health
71match
modelofmymind.com
Home - Model of My Mind Psychology
1 shared topicsmental-health
70match
oddmindpsychology.com
Home — Odd Mind Psychology
1 shared topicsmental-health
70match
calmapsych.com
Home - Calma Psychological Services
1 shared topicsmental-health
70match
oasispsychservices.com
Home - Oasis Psychological Services
1 shared topicsmental-health
70match
oasispsychologicalservices.com
Home - Oasis Psychological Services
1 shared topicsmental-health
70match
oasispsych.com
Home - Oasis Psychological Services
1 shared topicsmental-health
70match
dionszer.com
Dion Szer Psychology
1 shared topicsmental-health
70match
shieldpsychologicalservices.com
Home - Shield Psychological Services
1 shared topicsmental-health
69match
kosachenko.com
Coaching | Psychology
1 shared topicsmental-health
69match
oasismindlab.com
Home Page - Oasis Mind Lab Psychology
1 shared topicsmental-health
69match
annelewismoore.com
Home | Clinical Psychologis
1 shared topicsmental-health
69match
knottjustyou-demo.com
Chloe Knott Psychology
1 shared topicsmental-health
69match
harmoniasolutions.co.uk 🇬🇧
Welcome - Harmonia Psychology Solutions
1 shared topicsmental-health
69match
cisolutions.ie 🇮🇪
CI PSYCHOLOGY SOLUTIONS
1 shared topicsmental-health
69match
angelespsychologygroup.com
Angeles Psychology Group
1 shared topicsmental-health

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.