Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andyfitz.me

Andrew Fitzpatrick's Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
andrewd.ai
Andrew Dai's Portfolio Site
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
mattwood.dev
Matt's Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
alanszhang.dev
Alan's Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
arnavdoshi.com
Arnav's Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
donaldvu.com
Donald Vu's Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
andrewray.me
Andy Ray's Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
adrianaito.info
Adriana's Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
kristencendana.com
Kristen's Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
arnolio.dev
Arnolio - Arnold Truong's Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
andrewmullins.dev
Andrew Mullins Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
andrewnewton.me
Andrew's Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
alexjsully.me
AlexJSully's Portfolio & Showcase
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
roberto-contreras.com
Roberto Contreras's Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
adrianhossen.dev
Adrian's Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
andrewwhitty.dev
Andrew Whitty | BI Developer | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
andrewwhitman.com
Andrew Whitman Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
irfankhatri.com
Irfan Khatri Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
mathisrgt.com
Mathis' Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.