Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andybell.dev

Andy-Bell (Andy Bell) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
andy-bell.dev
Andy-Bell (Andy Bell) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
83match
andyroxby.me
aroxby (Andy Roxby) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
83match
achm6174.com
achm6174 (Andy Chung) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
82match
bellmer.me
eBellmer (Ethan Bellmer) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
bostonphp.org
SERP XXX · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
bellur.dev
SametBELLUR (Samet BELLUR) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
1lt.dev
1LtFord · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
aaix.dev
aaix (aidan) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
drotth.com
drotth (Andreas Drotth) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
rokit.dev
trey-k · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
a-jd.dev
a-jd (AJ Dave) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
faqeel.dev
faqeel (Fares) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
bob-hall.com
cousinbenson (Bob Hall) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
dombean.com
dombean · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
80match
alecv.tech
alecvdp (Alec) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
krysov.com
Krysov (krysov) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
newmanhaasracing.com
danielcary (Daniel) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
rogze.com
Rogze (Romain Zwiebel) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.