similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to andyanderegg.com

Andy Anderegg – Andy Anderegg · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

aninnocentworld.com

Douglas A. King – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Site Title – ABSY

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

alybrownbooks.com

Aly Brown – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

andreajames.net

Andrea S. James – andreajames.net

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Bobbi Rise – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bonnielouwriter.com

Bonnie Lou – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

andrewmfriday.com

Andrew M. Friday – Andrew M. Friday

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Anna Haines – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Bowen Blair – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Isla Stuart – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Nikah North – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ananddelight.com

Welcome – Anand's Musings

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

andbabbling.com

& babbling – a site for this and that

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Arnab Nandy – Editor | Writer

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bobshepherdauthor.com

Bob Shepherd – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Diz White – Actress and Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Max G Foster – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.