Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andy-davis.com

Andy Davis — Principal Product Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
suzannereeves.com
Suzanne Reeves | Principal Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
78match
mohsinamjed.com
Mohsin Amjed: Principal Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
78match
camcress.com
Cam Cress — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
isaiasulevich.com
Isaias Ulevich — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
ankitabhagwat.com
Ankita Bhagwat — Product Designer Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
helenshoe.com
Helen Shoe — Product designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
lydiashan.com
Lydia Shan — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
mackenziehung.com
Mackenzie Hung — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
divinside.com
Div — Principal Product/UX & Design System Specialist Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
mandamadioti.com
Eleni — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
dougnoronha.com
Douglas Noronha — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
helenxli.com
Helen Li — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
knowriley.com
Riley Knowles — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
mabetar.com
Mabetar — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
machisto.com
Eylon Goren - Portfolio | Principal Product Designer | Tel Aviv Israel
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
annaknick.com
Anna Knick — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
bastienleprince.com
Bastien Leprince — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
monikasisodiadesigns.com
Monika Sisodia — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.