Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andrezorn.dev

Andre Zorn · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
andrewnbishop.com
Andrew Bishop – Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
andrewnessin.com
Andrew Nessin
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
andrewdavis.dev
Andrew Davis
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
pimia.dev
Lauri Pimiä
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
andrewrcr.dev
Andrew Creekmore - Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
andrewcreekmore.dev
Andrew Creekmore - Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
andrewsweeney.net
Andrew Sweeney
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
andrewstillmartin.com
Andrew Martin
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
1benw.com
Ben Walker - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
andrewd1.dev
Home | Andrew's Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
altaieh.tech
Yacoub Altayeh | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
abdulmannan.dev
Abdul Mannan - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
matiullah.dev
Matiullah Karimi | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
ahvenniemi.info
Sami Ahvenniemi — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
mateocela.com
Mateo Çela | Full Stack Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
achrafsabbar.com
Achraf Sabbar
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
armaizadenwala.com
Software Engineer Portfolio - JS, Python, Ruby | Armaiz
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
andrewgottlieb.net
Andrew Gottlieb
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.