Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andrewsforge.com

Andrew's Forge · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
andrewdolby.com
Andrew Dolby
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
andrewkluttz.com
Andrew's Coding Lab
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
andrewjslater.com
Andrew J Slater
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
andrewtheterp.com
Andrew
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
andrewtatham.com
Andrew Tatham
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
andrewblinn.com
andrew blinn
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
andrewklinge.com
Andrew Klinge
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
andyschmitt.io
Andrew Schmitt
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
andrewmarkle.com
Andrew Markle · Andrew Markle
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
andrewkingme.com
/work - andrewk.ing
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
andrewfeeney.me
AndrewFeeney.me - Home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
andrewlock.net
Andrew Lock | .NET Escapades
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
andrewlock.dev
Andrew Lock | .NET Escapades
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewfavia.dev
Andrew Favia | Andrea Favia
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewburger.net
Andrew Burger · The personal website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewsturman.com
Andrew Sturman | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
andrewls.net
AndrewLS — Software Engineer | C++, Flutter & Python
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
andrewsoteriou.net
AndrewLS — Software Engineer | C++, Flutter & Python
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.