Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andrewlin.dev

Bork | Andrew Lin · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
andrewemerson.io
Andrew Emerson
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
andrewsperry.com
Portfolio | Andrew Sperry
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
andrewblum.me
Andrew Blum
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
andrewhertzberg.dev
Andrew Hertzberg
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
aaronlindsay.dev
Aaron Lindsay | Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
andrewhoblit.com
Andrew Hoblit
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
andrewnstewart.com
Andrew Stewart
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andrewjsimmons.com
Andrew Simmons
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andrewlfreund.com
Andrew L Freund - Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
andrewmcdonough.com
Andrew McDonough
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
andrewblackwell.dev
Andrew Blackwell
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
andrewgrandstaff.com
Andrew Grandstaff
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andrewshay.me
Home - andrewshay.me
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
andrewsblog.org
Posts – Andrew Fecheyr
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
adamdev.my
Mohamed Adam - Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
alexlazcano.dev
Alex Lazcano
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
andrewhanshaw.com
@AndrewHanshaw
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
boessena.com
Andrew Boessen Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.