Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andrewlethbridge.com

Andrew Lethbridge's Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
cindyblack.com
Cindy Black's Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
codebyian.com
Ian Norstad's Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
68match
marconis.dev
Developer Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
68match
mariomar.dev
Developer Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
amitmehta.dev
Amit Mehta Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
68match
ethanmossdev.com
Ethan Moss - Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
simonrosset.com
Simon Rosset - Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
anishmahajan.tech
Anish Mahajan | Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
arshpreetsinghcse.com
Arshpreet Singh Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
codistiano.dev
Abedela Bedru - Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
andybarringer.com
Andy Barringer | Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
andronachi09.com
andronachi09 | Personal portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
arielgoldring.dev
Ariel Goldring | Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
amir-aranibar.com
Backend Engineer Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
arseniiy.tech
Arseniiy Kapshtyk - Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
ethanh-dev.com
Ethan Ho | Personal Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
patbriggs.com
Pat Briggs's Personal Site and Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
arranvanaerschot.dev
root@arranvanaerschot ~ portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.