Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andrewhyde.dev

Andrew Hyde · Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
andrewghaly.com
Andrew Ghaly - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andrewbenkert.com
Andrew Benkert | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andrewrivera.me
Andrew Rivera - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
adrianlara.org
Adrian Lara | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ahmadx.dev
Ahmad Hassan - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
guerrajavierswe.com
Portfolio | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
rlabs.dev
Rishu Patel · Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
alexdunne.net
Alex Dunne | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
mauryakaran.com
Karan Maurya - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
roshanpatil.com
Roshan Patil | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
arthursena.com
sena | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
adilraqioui.tech
Adil Raqioui — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andrewelalfy.com
Andrew Alalfy | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
bnuckols.com
Brennon Nuckols | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
dnuge.dev
Daniel Nugent | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andrewcase.net
Andrew Case - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andrewdeck.dev
Andrew Deck | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
abubakar-noorulhassan.com
Software Engineer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.