Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andrewforrest.dev

Andrew — Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
faridbastoros.com
Farid's Portfolio
2 shared topicscloud-computing
70match
nhimr.com
Nhim Roeung | Portfolio
2 shared topicscloud-computing
70match
sohaib0khan.com
Sohaib Khan - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
nicholasliszewski.com
Nick Liszewski Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
ahmedbelguith.tech
Ahmed Belguith | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
cloudzenhub.com
Dhivya Lakshmi | Portfolio
2 shared topicscloud-computing
68match
adilrmallick.com
Adil R. Mallick - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
ronaldbonsu.com
Ronald A. Bonsu | Portfolio
2 shared topicscloud-computing
68match
aba-alkhail.dev
Fahad Aba-Alkhail | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
andrewpearce.io
Andrew Pearce
2 shared topicscloud-computing
67match
andrewcharleshay.com
Andrew Hay — SRE & DevOps
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
andrewsimkovsky.com
Andrew Simkovsky
2 shared topicscloud-computing
67match
andrewgiangrant.com
Andrew Giangrant
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andrewmatveychuk.com
Andrew Matveychuk
2 shared topicscloud-computing
66match
matveychuk.com
Andrew Matveychuk
2 shared topicscloud-computing
66match
felixmoronge.com
Felix Moronge | DevOps Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicscloud-computing
66match
faraguti.com
Felipe Faraguti - Cloud Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicscloud-computing
66match
clouddevopseng.com
Theodore Lawrence | Cloud & DevOps Portfolio
2 shared topicscloud-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.