Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andrewdeck.dev

Andrew Deck | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
84match
mashoado.com
Masho Ado | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
nezih.dev
Nezih | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
alejandrovecchio.dev
Alejandro Vecchio | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
dnhen.com
dnhen | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
andynewman.dev
Andy Newman - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
arthursena.com
sena | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
fdaniall.com
Fakhri Danial | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
angierodriguez.dev
Angie Rodriguez | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
kwonjustin.com
Justin Kwon | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
abdul-wahhab.com
Abdul Wahhab | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
akshaymondal.com
Akshay Mondal - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
guerrajavierswe.com
Portfolio | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
alfunkso.net
Alfonso Cornejo – Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
farisantoni.com
Faris Danish | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
ronaldsequeira.com
Ronald Flores | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
andrewjohnlewis.com
Andrew Lewis | Software Engineering Leader
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
andrewlewis.me
Andrew Lewis | Software Engineering Leader
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
mattpetts.com
Matt Petts | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.