Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andrewdavis.dev

Andrew Davis · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
andrewstillmartin.com
Andrew Martin
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
andrewnessin.com
Andrew Nessin
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
andrewsweeney.net
Andrew Sweeney
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
andrewcroy.dev
Andrew Croy.Dev
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
andrewgottlieb.net
Andrew Gottlieb
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
andrewnbishop.com
Andrew Bishop – Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
andrezorn.dev
Andre Zorn
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
andrewddufresne.com
Andrew Dufresne Personal Website
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
andrewcoder.dev
Portfolio | Andrew Nicholson
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
andrewxu.tech
Andrew Xu | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
andrewflanery.dev
Andrew Flanery - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
andrewhill.io
Home | Drew Hill
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
andrewd1.dev
Home | Andrew's Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andrewcreekmore.dev
Andrew Creekmore - Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewrcr.dev
Andrew Creekmore - Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewtbiehl.com
Andrew T. Biehl | Welcome to my personal website!
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
agst.dev
Davi Augusto
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
alejandroblanco.dev
Alejandro Blanco's homepage
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.