Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to andrewcase.net

Andrew Case - Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
andrewghaly.com
Andrew Ghaly - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andrewrivera.me
Andrew Rivera - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andrewdeck.dev
Andrew Deck | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andrewhyde.dev
Andrew Hyde · Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
andriyn.tech
Andri Yani - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
andrewflincoln.com
Andrew Lincoln | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
asimali.net
Asim Ali - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ahsankhan.io
Ahsan Khan - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
fcoterroba.com
fcoterroba - software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
rockhalil.com
Roc Khalil - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
3raul.com
Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
arthursena.com
sena | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
andynewman.dev
Andy Newman - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
ahmedragab.info
Ahmed Ragab - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
bekkhus.dev
Max Bekkhus - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
sokuranton.dev
Anton Sokur - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
dnhen.com
dnhen | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
nezih.dev
Nezih | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.